Author(s): Angelo L. Lozano
Abstract: Protected areas under the National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS) in the Philippines serve as critical habitats for biodiversity conservation. This mini-review compares two biodiversity monitoring approaches used in NIPAS-declared areas of Luzon remote sensing in Mt. Pulag National Park and field-based rapid biodiversity assessment in Bataan National Park. The Mt. Pulag study employed Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) to detect forest disturbance, while the Bataan study conducted species-level surveys to document biological richness. The review highlights key differences in data type, scale, and application: remote sensing allows for broad-scale, time-series habitat monitoring, while ground-based surveys offer direct ecological insights but are limited by time and area. The review concludes that combining these approaches can create a more effective and adaptive biodiversity monitoring system, aligned with the objectives of the NIPAS framework. An integrated method linking technology, field data, and local participation will better support conservation decision-making in protected areas.
Keywords: biodiversity monitoring, community-based monitoring, field assessment, remote sensing, protected area
Article Info:
Received: 22 May 2025; Received in revised form: 17 Jun 2025; Accepted: 20 Jun 2025; Available online: 26 Jun 2025
| Total View: 1428 | Downloads: 20 | Page No: 196-198 | Download PDF |
Cite this Article:
APA | ACM | Chicago | Harvard | IEEE | MLA | Vancouver | Bibtex


